|
The
Movie "The Passion of the Christ" emsevoldog Brian Nelson's "Passion" Consolidation All in 1 Super Study Page |
"Sponsored Links" |
| 2-29-04 Leap Year
Day. Today I saw the film " The Passion of the Christ". It was a fantastic picture! You should see it! It could change your outlook on what God has done for you. It may affect what you plan to do for the rest of your life. If you are an adult and have a reason not to see it, please call me so we can talk about it. If you want to write out your thoughts on the movie I will publish it here with your name. Mel Gibson was asked if he was in the movie. He said that he was but it was only of a clip of his hands giving a final death blow to Jesus He wanted to take the responsibility as man for the death of our Lord> Brian Nelson Houston 713-467-3025 bnelson@PartyTentCity.com |
|
| Forum Questions and Comments ABOUT THE MOVIE " The Passion of the Christ. " |
| ENMITY - Meaning and Definition of the Word... Easton Bible Dictionary. Definition: deep-rooted hatred or ill will. |
| HI, THese are answers sent in by various readers. If you agree or disagree let me know. If you want people to write to you about your thoughts advise me to post your email address with your posting. . Brian |
| 1. RE: The Devil and the Baby. "WE SAW THE MOVIE OF THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST BUT WAS WONDERING IF ANYONE COULD TELL US WHAT THE BABY THAT THE DEVIL WAS HOLDING STOOD FOR. PLEASE RESPOND ASAP. THANK YOU Donald Johnson |
|
2,It is a visual reference to Genesis
3:15 "And I will put enmity between you and the woman (Mary), and between your
seed (the devil's baby/the evil of the world) and her Seed (Jesus); He shall
bruise your head and you shall bruise His heel." The evil/those who reject
Jesus and embrace the ways of the devil are represented by that baby. That is
my understanding of it and is what my pastor explained to me. Hope that helps.
God Bless, Wayne A Adams
|
|
3. MY HUSBAND AND I SAW
"THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST" THIS PAST SUNDAY. . .. AND IT IS STILL VIVIDLY WITH
US. . . . IT WAS A DRAINING, EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE. . . ONE THAT I AM CERTAIN
WILL BE WITH US FOR THE REST OF OUR LIVES. . .
HOWEVER, THERE WERE THREE
SCENES WHICH BAFFLED US. . .
1- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
BABY BEING HELD BY THE DEVIL??? See above. Send Brian your
comments. .
2 - MARY PICKING UP THE
STONES DURING THE CRUCIFIXION?? (THE FIRST INSTANCE THE STONES WERE USED WAS
VERY CLEAR. . . "LET HE WHO IS WITHOUT SIN . . . ."). Would someone please respond
this question.?
3- A BIRD PLUCKS OUT THE
EYE OF ONE OF THE MEN CRUCIFIED WITH JESUS. . . . WHAT WAS
THE SIGNIFICANCE HERE? Would someone please respond
this question.?
I AM A RELIGIOUS EDUCATION
TEACHER. . . . BUT AM COMPLETELY BAFFLED BY THE ABOVE.
IF YOU COULD ENLIGHTEN ME. .
. . I WOULD DEEPLY APPRECIATE IT. . . .
THANKS. . .
. LIA CERATO
|
| 5. Send your answers to : Brian Nelson bnelson@PartyTentCity.com |
|
6. I saw the movie a week ago and
I am still affected by it. This movie changed my life, the way I think and
everything else.
It was really hard to watch
but I think I am a different person for watching it. It moved me and affected
me ”I LOVED IT AND EVERYONE SHOULD SEE THIS MOVIE” Mary Lynn Holmes |
| 7. I LOVED THE MOVIE ITS A REAL EYE OPENER AND I REALIZED THAT PEOPLE TAKE FOR GRANTED WHAT JESUS DID FOR US AND I CRIED ALL YESTERDAY MARCH 16, 2004 BECAUSE OF ALL THE UGLINESS IN THE WORLD PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE UP AND REALIZE WHAT HAS BEEN DONE FOR US.. VICTORIA ESQUEDA |
| 8. Comments Here are not necessarily those of anyone and could be true or not. You let me know. Brian bnelson@PartyTentCity.com |
9 Hi Brian,
My name's Martin, 21 and new Christian for about a year- life is good. I am eager to share with you my insights. I stumbled onto your website and I think that I may have more to say about the 'baby' question.
Firstly, to fix up a mistake
somebody said about Genesis 3:15, the woman mentioned therein is Eve. God
was speaking to Adam, Eve and Satan in the garden. Mary wasn't born as yet.
Genesis 3:15 was 'fulfilled', or a pre-cursor anyway, at the beginning of the
film when Jesus stamps and kills the head of the serpent in the garden.
Now to what the baby means,
simply this: Who is the father of this world? Who has temporary dominion? Satan.
If we don't accept God's adoption then we are all his children. Basically
the adversary was saying, "Who is your father? I am. You are like all the rest.
I control you, my son" Tempting him to believe he had been forsaken of His true
Father. In essence that baby represented how the enemy wanted Jesus to see
himself in relation to Satan. I actually saw the movie a month back so maybe I
can't remember accurately, but just before you see the baby I believe Jesus says
something like-"Father, you can sustain me in your strength." Then you see the
enemy and the baby- almost as if Satan heard Jesus and came straight back with
his lie. Again the father idea.
For question number two: Mary
definitely picked up the rocks as a connection for the viewers to link back to
the scene where she was about to be stoned. He saved her, but who will save Him?
She wants to- but can't. He doesn't deserve this. Actually... thinking more
about it, it could be something else, like a wheel within a wheel. Just as
passages of scripture can go deeper and be double purposed. It could refer to in
Mary's mind what she perceives is going on in Jesus' mind. Almost wanting
to hand him the stones to use against his torturers. "Let him who is without sin
cast the first stone." That ONLY applies to Christ. But Christ won't to do it
"for they know not what they do." Juxtaposing this idea of fighting back to
Christ's no-retalliative behavior for full effect in showing his Agape
character. I don't remember when Jesus said those words in relation to Mary
picking up the stones. But if he said them soon after it would like a glove.
Not to sure about the eye one. Could
just be for cinematic effect. Deny Christ and you have no protection. Perhaps
more like an omen as the bird was a crow. Could also be a reference to the death
of his spiritual eyesight being plucked by the darkness- not realizing the son
of God next to him on the cross.
Well that's my thought. It was fun
and God bless you all. I'd love to get in touch with anybody who wants to
discuss my insights further. Now let our Father in Heaven grant us Logicians the
spiritual eye salve we so desperately need. Amen. Martin, 21
|
|
10 I saw the movie Passion of the
Christ. It was such a great movie at the same time very sad. It made remember
why I'm here today and what Jesus did for us.
I've heard that some scenes in the
movie are not true, like the bird plucking the man's eye and the devil showing
up so many times.
Can you tell me if that is true or not?
Jezabelle Couture
|
|
11.. Hey Brian,
My name is Marcia Boland. I am a
26 year old pastor's wife. My husband is speaking about what Jesus/ the bible
says about Satan. So i thought i would get some pictures from the movie off the
internet to put on PowerPoint. i some how ended up at your forum. I think it's
great that you are seeking some answers and have input from different people. I
love that Mel's movie makes us "think"! If nothing else ever came of it, I'm
confident that would be reward enough to him.
Let me share my thoughts on a few
of the topics. You may or may not have already heard them.
I actually got to see a premiere
of the movie in Chicago back in January. Mel Gibson was there and did an
interview with Bill Hybels - the pastor of Willow Creek Community Church.
In regards to how Satan was
portrayed, he simply shared that Satan is the author of deception and lies. He
comes dressed as an angel of light and the baby was Mel's way of showing that.
Babies are innocent and precious, so he used that deception. But when the baby
turned around it was ugly and old. That's how Satan works. When we see Him in
the light of truth, he is no longer beautiful. We are made aware of his
ugliness. As far as I can see, there is no scripture to draw from for the exact
analogy of the baby. But the idea behind it is all through scripture.
The whole bird plucking the eye
out is also not in scripture. It is a creative right that Gibson took. But his
reason for including it is also valid. He shared in one of His interviews that
he had done EXTENSIVE research on crucifixions. And it is recorded that such
things did happen. That as the life was draining out of the bodies, bugs and
vultures would be attacking them, very similar to how they would act towards a
wounded animal in nature.
The tough thing about this movie
is that it's too real! It's uncomfortable. We would rather just think of
Christ's death as simple... he was nailed to tree, and he died. It hurts to have
to think about what we did to him. That he actually was TORTURED! I love this
movie because it forces me to remember how much he really sacrificed for me! and
that He did as a human with all the physical pain and suffering that we would
have felt had it happened to us. Only more... because aside from the human
suffering, he had the God suffering of having to take on the sins of the world.
Something we could never understand!
Thanks for letting me share with
you. I hope this movie continues to impact your life.
God Bless,
Marcia Boland
|
|
12
Brian-
My understanding of the scene
with Satan and the baby is as follows. In Genesis 3, the prophecy of enmity
being between the serpent and the woman and her seed and his (devil) seed is the
backdrop. However, it seems that the devil is taunting Mary and Jesus, Mary
specifically. The devil is sending her the message, "Yes, God said that there
would be enmity between us and our seed, but see, your seed is coming to a
bitter end today, while mine is still in his infancy and promises to be here
tomorrow. This is all to inflict a psychological and emotional blow Mary and
Jesus.
Gerald Arnett
|
| 13 Your comments or Question here. |
| 14 Your comments or Question here. |
| 15 Your comments or Question here. |
| 16 Your comments or Question here. |
| 17 Your comments Question here. |
| 18 Your comments Question here. |
|
MATTHEW Gospel used coming. |
MARK | LUKE | JOHN |
This is the movie everyone is talking
about. THE PASSION OF THE
CHRIST is a vivid depiction of the
last 12 hours of Jesus Christ's life. It is rated R because what happened to
Jesus was very violent.


| This is a multiple page recap of the wonderful provocative new movie. CLICK ON ANY UNDERLINED HYPERLINKS. Don't miss the opening of this movie. See what others are talking about. Then discuss it. You will be looking for more information about Jesus Christ. You will find it in your bible. Click Bible Gateway.com Locate Anything in the All Versions of the Bible. |
|
|
You are at http://www.BrianNelsonConsulting.com/the-passion-of-the-christ.com/index.html ud 08/01/2004 08:50 PM -0500
|
|
Click links for bio, photos, movies, and posters: Jesus Christ: James Caviezel Mary: Maia Morgenstern Mary Magdalene: Monica Bellucci Gesmas: Francesco Cabras Satan: Rosalinda Celentano Pilatus Wife: Claudia Gerini Pilatus: Ivano Marescotti Dismas: Sergio Rubini John: Hristo Jiukov |
|
Michael Medved "Overreaction will cause more anti-Semitism than movie itself" Saturday, February 7, 2004 Overwhelming Advance Tickets Support Friday, February 6, 2004 Man Buys 6,000 Tickets For Passion Movie Thursday, February 5, 2004 Australian Jewish Group OKs Passion Thursday, February 5, 2004 Anti-Defamation League Actually Helping? Thursday, February 5, 2004
|
|
Click
Brian's
Bible Pronunciation.com for a Audio Version
Pronunciation of Bible Names. Click Bible Gateway.com Locate Anything in the All Versions of the Bible. |
|
|
Click here.
See
44 seconds of the movie.
You may need Quick Time Play to be downloaded
(free).
|
||
|
'Passion'
Surpasses $200 Million Mark As Comedian Steve Martin Mocks Movie By Jimmy Moore Talon News March 8, 2004 SPARTANBURG, SC (Talon News) -- Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," which has already far exceeded industry expectations in less than two weeks in theaters, surpassed the $200 million mark on Sunday. In just its second weekend, "The Passion of the Christ" earned an additional $51.4 million showing at 3,170 theaters and remained at the top of the box office for the second week in a row with an astonishing $16,211 per theater average. The movie about the final twelve hours of Jesus' life has now earned a stunning $212 million after only 12 days since its debut. Incredibly, the movie only saw a drop of 38.7 percent from last week's record-breaking opening. This is similar to the decline seen by the blockbuster Spiderman in its second week in 2002. Most successful films see at least a 50 percent drop from the first week. The $51.4 million earned by "The Passion of the Christ" is better than the $50.6 million garnered by 11-time Oscar-winning film "The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King" in its second week. Since 1980, movies released between January and April have not traditionally performed well enough to earn $200 million. "The Passion of the Christ" now joins "My Big Fat Greek Wedding," which took 120 days to reach that milestone, as the only two movies ever to do it in that time frame. "The Passion of the Christ" is the all-time box office earner for February as well as the biggest opening week in February. Newmarket Films president Bob Berney said the movie has continued to perform well because of "incredible word-of-mouth" promotion among all demographics including "very, very strong Latino and African-American" support. "I think this is an event or phenomenon, and people are checking it out across the board," Berney commented. Berney feels confident "The Passion of the Christ" will go over $300 million. The movie has already earned close to the same as the much-heralded Wednesday-opener "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King," which grossed $222 in its first 12 days. Bruce Davey, one of the producers of the film, said Gibson is "obviously delighted" with the reception it has received. Although Sunday's sales are estimated, the movie will likely see higher sales than predicted, as evidenced by last week's $7 million increase in actual sales over projected sales. "The Passion of the Christ" has now become the 48th highest grossing film of all time and will continue to rapidly climb into the top ten in the coming weeks. Despite the overwhelming success of "The Passion of the Christ," comedian Steve Martin decided to ridicule the movie in an op-ed piece for The New Yorker magazine. Martin used biting satire to make fun of Gibson and his movie. Describing Jesus as a "likable" character, Martin says he does not understand why God's Son cannot "catch a break." Martin adds that Jesus' refusal to use his "superpowers" to save himself seemed awkward. As for the opening scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, Martin wrote that this should have been changed. "Does it matter which garden? Gethsemane is hard to say, and Eden is a much more recognizable garden. Just thinking out loud," Martin continued. Suggesting the movie title be changed to "Lethal Passion," a reference to the "Lethal Weapon" movies starring Gibson in the 1980s, Martin continued his attacks by complaining that there were no Hispanic actors in the movie. "Could the rabbis be Hispanic? There's lots of hot Latino actors now, could give us a little zing at the box office," Martin wrote. Mocking the spiritual symbol of the cross, Martin said that it "has been done to death." Instead, he suggests Jesus be placed on "a wagon wheel. "Finally, Martin apparently believes the movie is anti-Semitic as a small minority have suggested over the past year. "In the description of the bystanders, there should be a space between the words 'Jew' and 'boy'," Martin wrote. There has been no comment about Martin's remarks by Gibson or his production company, Icon Productions. |
|
The Paul Harvey Quote???? Comments:
This text ( below ) is falsely attributed to radio commentator Paul Harvey. It
was actually written by Keith A. Fournier, founder of the
Catholic Way Website, where it was originally
published. The full article can be found
here.
In most copies of the circulating email, an additional article correctly attributed to columnist David Limbaugh is appended to the above. As both articles suggest, Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," scheduled for U.S. release on February 25, 2004, has generated heated controversy ever since the project was announced. Some have even called for a boycott of the movie on grounds of anti-Semitism.
Paul Harvey ?? Comments on "The Passion"
by Mel Gibson
I really did not know what to expect. I
was thrilled to have been invited to a private viewing of Mel Gibson's film "The
Passion," butI had also read all the cautious articles and spin. I grew up in a
Jewish town and owe much of my own faith journey to the influence. I have a life
long, deeply held aversion to anything that might even
indirectly encourage any form of anti-Semitic thought, language or actions.
I arrived at the private viewing for "The
Passion," held in Washington, DC and greeted some familiar faces. The
environment was typically Washingtonian, with people greeting you with a smile
but seeming to look beyond you, having an agenda beyond the words. The film was
very briefly introduced, without fanfare, and then the room darkened. From the
gripping opening scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, to the very human and tender
portrayal of the earthly ministry of Jesus, through the betrayal, the arrest,
the scourging, the way of the cross, the encounter with the thieves, the
surrender on the Cross, until the final scene in the empty tomb, this was not
simply a movie; it was an encounter, unlike anything I have ever experienced.
In addition to being a masterpiece of
film-making and an artistic triumph, "The Passion" evoked more deep reflection,
sorrow and emotional reaction within me than anything since my wedding, my
ordination or the birth of my children. Frankly, I will never be the same. When
the film concluded, this "invitation only" gathering of
"movers and shakers" in Washington, DC were shaking indeed, but this time from sobbing. I am not sure there was a dry eye in the place. The crowd that had been glad-handing before the film was now eerily silent. No one could speak because words were woefully inadequate. We had experienced a kind of art that is a rarity in life, the kind that makes heaven touch earth. One scene in the film has now been forever etched in my mind. A brutalized, wounded Jesus was soon to fall again under the weight of the cross. His mother had made her way along the Via Della Rosa. As she ran to him, she flashed back to a memory of Jesus as a child, falling in the dirt road outside of their home. Just as she reached to protect him from the fall, she was now reaching to touch his wounded adult face. Jesus looked at her with intensely probing and passionately loving eyes (and at all of us through the screen) and said "Behold I make all things new." These are words taken from the last Book of the New Testament, the Book of Revelations. Suddenly,the purpose of the pain was so clear and the wounds, that earlier in the film had been so difficult to see in His face, His back, indeed all over His body, became intensely beautiful. They had been borne voluntarily for love. At the end of the film, after we had all had a chance to recover, a question and answer period ensued. The unanimous praise for the film, from a rather diverse crowd, was as astounding as the compliments were effusive. The questions included the one question that seems to follow this film, even though it has not yet even beenr eleased "Why is this film considered by some to be 'anti-Semitic?"
We would all be well advised to remember
that the Gospel narratives to which "The Passion" is so faithful were written by
Jewish men who followed a Jewish Rabbi whose life and teaching have forever
changed the history of the world. The problem is not the message but those who
have distorted it and used it for hate rather than love. The solution is not to
censor the message, but rather to promote the kind of gift of love that is Mel
Gibson's filmmaking masterpiece, "The Passion." It should be seen by as many
people as possible. I intend to do everything I can to make sure that is the
case. I am passionate about "The Passion."
The Paul Harvey Quote???? Comments:
This text ( below ) is falsely attributed to radio commentator Paul Harvey. It
was actually written by Keith A. Fournier, founder of the
Catholic Way Website, where it was originally
published. The full article can be found
here.
|
| 1 Hollywood Community |
Motion Picture Association Jack ValentiCEO I thought Passion was a
superior recounting of the ‘greatest story ever told,’ the last days of Jesus.
There is in the film the gravity and seriousness it deserves. There are moments
so heart-rending, the tears come easily. I cannot but believe that people of all
religions will find this truly an impressive (and respectful) piece of art and
realism, emerging from the New Testament. As a cinema artist, you have just
reason to be proud of what you have done. (From a letter to Mel Gibson, July
2003) Excerpts from Valenti’s appearance on MSNBC’s Scarborough:
SCARBOROUGH: What can you tell us about “The Passion”? |
| 2 Hollywood Community | William Peter Blatty Director of The Exorcist The Passion is a masterpiece. And beyond. I love his film and I love his faith and ardor and guts for doing it. (From an e-mail to Icon) |
| 3 Hollywood Community | Dean Devlin Producer of Independence Day, The Patriot, Godzilla First off, thank you so much for allowing me to see your incredible film, “The Passion”. In all honesty, I think it’s a masterwork. I loved everything about your film. The performances, the staging, the photography and the story telling are everything I dream about when I think of movies. You’ve totally outdone yourself with this exquisite film. I can’t begin to tell you how honored I was to be able to see the film. I’m still getting over the incredible impact the film had on me. (From a letter sent to Icon) |
| 4 Hollywood Community | Variety Peter Bart Editor The precept of freedom of expression often takes a back seat once the ideologues and pedants get involved. Mel Gibson’s movie, “The Passion,” provides the latest and most vivid example. Though Gibson is still editing his film and has shown it to a very small number of people, there already are cries of protest and dark insinuations of an anti-Semitic subtext. …These blatherings strike us as irresponsible. The film, which depicts the final hours of Jesus’ life, was fully financed by Gibson, who directed it but did not appear in it. It is clearly an art film, dark and disturbing. Some will be moved by this film, others disturbed. As with all previous films depicting the period, some scholars and theologians will doubtless challenge Gibson’s historical accuracy – indeed he is an actor, not a Biblical scholar. But to condemn both the film and the filmmaker in advance reflects both bigotry and a disdain for free expression. (Variety, |
| 5 Mainstream Media |
Peggy Noonan Author,
Columnist
It is a powerful film, and I believe it will prove historic -- a real moment in the history of cinematic treatments of the greatest story ever told. Be happy and proud. It is going to be huge. (From an email to Icon) |
| 6 Mainstream Media |
Drudge ReportMatt Drudge From MSNBC: DRUDGE:
This may be the last movie Mel Gibson makes. This is the ultimate film. It's
magical. Best picture I have seen in quite some time, and even people like Jack
Valenti were in the audience in tears at this screening. There was about 30 of
us. It depicts a clash between Jesus and those who crucified him, and speaking
as a Jew, I thought it was a magical film that showed the perils of life on
earth. |
| 7 Mainstream Media |
Rush Limbaugh Radio Talk Show
Host If you've heard the conventional wisdom about this movie, due out during
Lent next year, you should listen to my firsthand account of it. I really didn't
want to give you all the details of the movie, but I did want to tell you its
affect on us. My stepdaughter cried for the last 30% of the movie, for example.
It's that powerful. Some people are probably put off because they think this
movie is religious. They shouldn't be, because it's not. There is nothing
offensive about this film. It's a movie about a religious figure, but the movie
itself isn't religious. I'm not making a fine point here, as you'll understand
after you see it. There is violence, of course, and that's factually accurate.
This movie does not preach; it doesn't try to convince you one-way or the other who or what Jesus was. It is very intimate. It doesn't matter if you're religious or atheistic or a snake handler. This movie will hit you in the gut. It has themes about man's inhumanity to man. It's also about one man standing by what he believes to be true - no matter the cost - and enduring. (Rush Limbaugh Show, Jul 28, 2003) |
| 8 Mainstream Media | American Enterprise Institute Michael Novak President In the Nicene Creed sung or recited by some 2 billion-plus Catholics (Greek, Orthodox, Roman), Anglicans, Lutherans, and other Protestants every Sunday, Jesus Christ is characterized as “suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried….” These ten words are the theme of Mel Gibson’s new movie (scheduled for release at Easter, 2004). It is the most powerful movie I have ever seen. A week after having watched a rough-cut version, I have still not been able to get The Passion out of my mind. At every Mass I have attended since, at the raising of the Body of Christ and then the Chalice of his Blood, its darkly colored, shocking images have flooded my memory, and suffused new vividness into the passion being reenacted on the altar. I don not know whether Mel Gibson and I are in any other way kindred spirits. No matter. I am in awe of the twelve-year work of art that Gibson has accomplished. No other movie on Christ even comes close. It belongs in the company of Handel’s Messiah and Bach’s St. Matthew’s Passion. The work of artists often soars above their human limitations. (Weekly Standard, Aug 25, 2003) |
| 9 Mainstream Media | Cal Thomas Syndicated Columnist As one who has seen virtually every modern biblical epic – I can say “The Passion” is the most beautiful, profound, accurate, disturbing, realistic and bloody depiction of this well-known story that has ever been filmed. Jim Caviezel, who plays Jesus with tender understatement, may be the best “Jesus” ever (not counting the original). To those within the Jewish community who worry that the film, which is scheduled for release next Easter season, might contain anti-Semitic elements, or encourage people to persecute Jews, fear not. This film does not indict Jews for the death of Jesus. It is faithful to the New Testament account. Gibson, a devout Roman Catholic, does not elevate Mary, Jesus’ mother, beyond what Scripture says of her, which will broaden the film’s appeal to Protestants. Thirteen years ago, actor Mickey Rooney wrote an editorial for “Variety” in which he said, “The on-screen depiction of religion is less than flattering, and as a Christian, I pray the era of denigrating religion on screen comes to a screeching halt. And soon.” Rooney’s prayer has been answered with “The Passion.” It is a soul-stirring film, which deserves wide distribution and viewing. Its message is not just for Christians, but for everyone. I doubt if a better film about Jesus could be made. (Tribune Media, Aug 5, 2003) |
| 10 Jewish Community |
David Klinghoffer Author,
Historian Jewish officialdom — that small, cozy world of community leaders and
other machers — is already getting agitated by Mel Gibson's
still-in-production Jesus movie. "The Passion" depicts the last 12 hours in the
life of Christianity's founder, and press reports suggest that it places blame
for the man's death firmly on Jewish shoulders. …One such orthodox belief insists that, despite what the Christian Gospels say, it wasn't Jews who killed Jesus: it was Romans acting on their own. You've heard this a million times, from Hebrew school onward. The Simon Wiesenthal Center's Rabbi Marvin Hier, referring to Gibson's making of "The Passion," recently told Reuters that he's concerned "that the film's purpose is to undo the changes made by Vatican II," which absolved the Jews of collective responsibility for Jesus' death. That "would unleash more of the scurrilous charges of deicide directed against the Jewish people." Yet authoritative Jewish sources teach that Jesus died at least partly thanks to decisions taken by his fellow Jews. That fact used to be covered up by our communal leaders lest antisemites discover and publicize it. But the discovery has already happened, as a quick Internet search will reveal. So why keep fooling ourselves? Maimonides says it unapologetically in his "Letter to Yemen": "Jesus of Nazareth... impelled people to believe that he was a prophet sent by God to clarify perplexities in the Torah, and that he was the Messiah that was predicted by each and every seer. He interpreted the Torah and its precepts in such a fashion as to lead to their total annulment, to the abolition of all its commandments and to the violation of its prohibitions. The sages, of blessed memory, having become aware of his plans before his reputation spread among our people, meted out fitting punishment to him." In this passage, Maimonides draws on the Talmud and the Tosefta, another ancient rabbinic text. One key talmudic passage, from tractate Sanhedrin (43a), was expunged by censors but preserved in manuscripts and is well known today: "On the eve of Passover they hung Jesus of Nazareth. The herald had gone forth forty days before [his death], (crying): 'Jesus of Nazareth goes forth to be stoned, because he has practiced magic and deceived and led astray Israel. Anyone who knows anything in his favor should come and declare concerning him.' But they found nothing in his favor." Stoning would have been followed by briefly hanging the body on a tree. As one modern scholar notes, "the Talmudic story of the execution of Jesus does not implicate the civil [Roman] government at all." …What's clear beyond doubt is that the Jewish community has a strong interest in fostering positive, warm relations with Catholics and other Christians. Surely, though, the cause of friendship with our non-Jewish fellow citizens is unlikely to be advanced by critiquing religious beliefs which closely mirror our own tradition. Our loyalty should be to Judaism and to truth, not to an officially sanctioned, sanitized version of Judaism or the truth — which may be neither Jewish nor true. (The Forward, May 3, 2003) David Klinghoffer is the author of "The Discovery of God: Abraham and the Birth of Monotheism," published this month by Doubleday. |
| 11 Jewish Community | David Horowitz Talk Show Host & Columnist Gibson's film is an artistic vision and must be judged that way. It is an awesome artifact, an overpowering work. I can't remember being so affected by a film before. It is extremely painful to watch and yet the violence is never gratuitous. You never feel like you want to take your eyes off the screen. It is a wracking emotional journey, which never strays from its inspirational purpose. It is as close to a religious experience as art can get. It is not anti-Semitic, as the film-burners have charged. Two illustrative details: Jesus is referred to in the film as "rabbi," and there is never any distancing of Jesus or his disciples from their Jewishness. (One point missed by ignorant bigots like Fredericksen whose only familiarity with The Passion is with a stolen script) is that while the film is in Aramaic -- a brilliant effect that enhances the symbolic resonance of the story -- it has subtitles. Second detail: A Jew carries Jesus' cross along the terrible route to Golgotha and shares his miseries. But yes the film is also faithful to the Gospels and therefore the Pharisees are Jesus' enemies and they and their flock do call for Jesus' death (and why wouldn't they since Jesus was a threat to their authority and their beliefs?). But all this is to miss the point. This is a Christian parable. The cruelty, intolerance and lack of compassion of human beings is limitless -- and we who have lived through the Twentieth Century know this all too well. The moral of this Christian story -- of Mel Gibson's film -- is that we all killed Jesus -- Jew and Gentile alike -- and tortured him, and we do so every day. But if you believe the vision that Gibson has rendered so searingly and so well, Jesus forgives us for that very act. Whosoever will give up cruelty and love his brother will enter paradise. That is the message that Gibson has framed in his extraordinary work. The effort to shut down his film before it opens is just another station of the cross. (FrontPageMag.com, Jul 30, 2003) |
| 12 Jewish Community | Toward Tradition Rabbi Daniel Lapin Never has a film aroused such hostile passion so long prior to its release as has Mel Gibson’s Passion. Many American Jews are alarmed by reports of what they view as potentially anti-Semitic content in this movie about the death of Jesus, which is due to be released during 2004. Clearly the crucifixion of Jesus is a sensitive topic, but prominent Christians who previewed it, including good friends like James Dobson and Michael Novak who have always demonstrated acute sensitivity to Jewish concerns, see it as a religiously inspiring movie, and refute charges that it is anti-Semitic. While most Jews are wisely waiting to see the film before responding, others are either prematurely condemning a movie they have yet to see. As an Orthodox rabbi with a wary eye on Jewish history which has an ominous habit of repeating itself, I fear that these protests, well intentioned though some may be, are a mistake. I believe those who publicly protest Mel Gibson’s film lack moral legitimacy. What is more, I believe their actions are not only wrong but even recklessly ill-advised and shockingly imprudent. I address myself to all my fellow Jews when I say that your interests are not being served by many of those organizations and self appointed defenders who claim to be acting on your behalf. Jewish groups that fracture friendship between Christians and Jews are performing no valuable service to American Jews. Jewish organizations protesting Passion are remarkably selective in their ire. It is so bizarre that the new movie Luther, which champions someone who was surely one of history’s most eloquent anti-Semites, gets a free pass from our self-appointed Jewish guardians. Only Gibson is evil, is that right? Again, why would the soon to be released new movie, The Gospel of John, be utterly immune to the censoring tactics of certain Jewish organizations? After all, the soundtrack includes virtually every word of the Gospel including the most unflattering descriptions of Jewish priests and Pharisees of Jesus’ time, along with implications of their complicity in the Crucifixion, yet not a peep of Jewish organizational protest. Could their conspicuous silence possibly have anything to do with the ethnicity of the producers of The Gospel of John? These include Garth Drabinsky, Sandy Pearl, Joel Michaels, Myron Gottleib, and Martin Katz. So if Jews quote the Gospel it is art but if Mel Gibson does the same, it is anti-Semitism? The Talmudic distinction eludes me. It probably eludes most Christians too. These protests against Passion are not only morally indefensible, but they are also stupid, for three reasons. The first reason is that that they are unlikely to change the outcome of the film. Mr. Gibson is an artist and a Catholic of deep faith of which this movie is an expression. By all accounts, his motive in making this movie was not commercial. In addition, anyone who saw his Braveheart would suspect that Mel Gibson profoundly identified with the hero of that epic, who allowed himself to be violently disemboweled rather than betray his principles. Does anyone really believe that Gibson is likely to yield to threats from Jewish organizations? Do any Jews actually believe they are going to prevent millions of Christians from seeing this movie? I don’t think Jews should see this movie; it isn’t about our religion. However the millions of Christians who do see it will find themselves profoundly moved and uplifted by it. The second and more important reason I consider these protests to be ill-advised is that while Jews are telling Gibson that his movie contradicts historical records about who really killed Jesus, Vatican Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos has this to say: Mr. Gibson has had to make many artistic choices in the way he portrays the characters and the events involved in the Passion, and he has complemented the Gospel narrative with the insights and reflections made by saints and mystics through the centuries. Mel Gibson not only closely follows the narrative of the Gospels, giving the viewer a new appreciation for those Biblical passages, but his artistic choices also make the film faithful to the meaning of the Gospels, as understood by the Church. Do we really want to open up the Pandora’s Box of suggesting that any faith may demand the removal of material that it finds offensive from the doctrines of any other faith? Do we really want to return to those dark times when Catholic authorities attempted to strip from the Talmud those passages that they found offensive? Some of my Jewish readers may feel squeamish about my alluding to the existence of Talmudic passages uncomplimentary toward Jesus as well as descriptive of Jewish involvement in his crucifixion. However the truth is that anyone with Internet access can easily locate those passages in about ten seconds. I think it far better that in the name of genuine Jewish-Christian friendship in America, we allow all faiths their own beliefs even if we find those beliefs troubling or at odds with our own beliefs. This way we can all prosper safely under the constitutional protection of the United States of America. Finally I believe the attacks on Mel Gibson are a mistake because while they may be in the interests of Jewish organizations who raise money with the specter of anti-Semitism, and while they may be in the interests of Jewish journalists at the New York Times and elsewhere who are trying to boost their careers, they are most decidedly not in the interests of most American Jews who go about their daily lives in comfortable harmony with their Christian fellow citizens. You see, many Christians see all this as attacks not just on Mel Gibson alone or as mere critiques of a movie, but with some justification in my view, they see them as attacks against all Christians. This is not so different from the way most people react to attack. We Jews usually feel that we have all been attacked even when only a few of us suffer assault on account of our faith. Right now, the most serious peril threatening Jews, and indeed perhaps all of western civilization, is Islamic fundamentalism. In this titanic twenty-first century struggle that links Washington DC with Jerusalem, our only steadfast allies have been Christians. In particular, those Christians that most ardently defend Israel and most reliably denounce anti-Semitism, happen to be those Christians most fervently committed to their faith. Jewish interests are best served by fostering friendship with Christians rather than cynically eroding them. Rejecting flagrant anti-Christianism on the part of Jews claiming to be acting on our behalf would be our wisest course as a community. Doing so would have one other advantage: it would also be doing the right thing. (WorldNetDaily.com, Sept. 25, 2003) |
| 13 Jewish Community | Michael Medved Film Critic Radio Show Host Recently I watched a rough version of this work in progress, and it represents by far the most moving, substantive, and artistically successful adaptation of Biblical material ever attempted by Hollywood. The premature efforts to discredit Gibson and his ambitious movie come at a time when committed Jews and serious Christians have been working together as never before to advance our common values – in the Middle East and in America. All people of conscience should encourage their burgeoning coalition, and resist unfair attacks on an unfinished project by an inspired, idealistic filmmaker. (Salem Radio Network, Aug 2003) It is by a very large margin of advantage the most effective cinematic adaptation of a biblical story I have ever seen. And it's the kind of movie that's going to touch people. (Fox News, The O’Reilly Factor, Aug 4, 2003) |
| 14 Catholic Leaders | The Vatican Pontifical Council for Social Communications Archbishop John Foley President A senior Vatican official who watched clips from Mel Gibson's controversial film "The Passion" offered enthusiastic praise Saturday for what he saw, despite concerns from Jewish groups that the movie will promote anti-Semitism. U.S. Archbishop John P. Foley of the church's social-communications office said he hoped to show the film in the Vatican and said he doubted whether criticisms of the film were valid. "From what I could see of the trailers, it seemed to be an excellent film," Foley said. "I don't think they would be well-founded criticisms because all the material in the film comes directly from the Gospel accounts. There's nothing in the film that doesn't come from the Gospel accounts. "So, if they're critical of the film, they would be critical of the Gospel." (Associated Press, Sept 13, 2003) |
| 15 Catholic Leaders |
The Vatican
Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos Worldwide Prefect of the
Clergy
As I watched this yet unfinished version of the film, I experienced moments of profound spiritual intimacy with Jesus Christ. It is a film that leads the viewer into prayer and reflection, into heartfelt contemplation. In fact, as I told Mr. Gibson after the screening, I would gladly trade some of the homilies that I have given about the passion of Christ for even a few of the scenes of his film. With this film, Mr Gibson has achieved something truly extraordinary. He has used the marvelous technology available through our modern means of communication to make the passion, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ come alive for the people of our times.What is more, the film as a work of art – the performances, the dazzling cinematography, the sounds, lighting, and pacing– is just as powerful as the message it contains. In my opinion, one of the great achievements of this film is to have shown so effectively both the horror of sin and selfishness, and the redeeming power of love. Seeing this film provokes love and compassion. It makes the viewer want to love more, to forgive, to be good and strong no matter what, just as Christ did even in the face of such terrible suffering. The viewer is drawn into a powerful experience of God’s strong yet gentle love, of his overflowing mercy. It is my belief that if we could understand what Jesus Christ did for us and we could follow his example of love and forgiveness, there would not be hatred or violence in the world. This film will help to make that possible. This film is a triumph of art and faith. It will be a tool for explaining the person and message of Christ. I am confident that it will change for the better everyone who sees it, both Christians and non-Christians alike. It will bring people closer to God, and closer to one another. Mr. Gibson has had to make many artistic choices in the way he portrays the characters and the events involved in the Passion, and he has complemented the Gospel narrative with the insights and reflections made by saints and mystics through the centuries. Mel Gibson not only closely follows the narrative of the Gospels, giving the viewer a new appreciation for those Biblical passages, but his artistic choices also make the film faithful to the meaning of the Gospels, as understood by the Church. Anti-Semitism, like all forms of racism, distorts the truth in order to put a whole race of people in a bad light. This film does nothing of the sort. It draws out from the historical objectivity of the Gospel narratives sentiments of forgiveness, mercy, and reconciliation. It captures the subtleties and the horror of sin, as well as the gentle power of love and forgiveness, without making or insinuating blanket condemnations against one group. This film expressed the exact opposite, that learning from the example of Christ, there should never be any more violence against any other human being. (La Stampa, Sept 18, 2003) |
| 16 Catholic Leaders | Cardinal Francis George Archbishop of Chicago From Chicago Sun Times Is “The Passion” – Mel Gibson’s upcoming film about the hours leading up to Jesus’ death – anti-Semitic? That depends how you interpret the Bible, says Cardinal Francis George, who saw a rough-cut version of the film two weeks ago. It’s a very graphic presentation of the passion of Christ in the Gospels,” George said Saturday. “For people who think that the passion narratives are themselves anti-Semitic, well then, it’s a presentation of those narratives. For those of us who don’t believe they’re anti-Semitic, that Christ died for our sins, all of us, and so therefore we all caused his death, it’s a way to portray, very graphically, the brutality of that execution in a Roman style.” “I’ve read the Passion narratives of the Lord and contemplated them and prayed over them many, many times, and I’ve never thought of the crucifixion with the images that I received while watching this,” George said. “I’ll never read the words the same way again.” (Chicago Sun Times, Aug 3, 2003) |
| 17 Catholic Leaders | Archbishop Charles Chaput Archbishop of Denver From Rocky Mountain News Beal: And what do you think [of The Passion]? Chaput: I thought it was an extraordinary work of art and extraordinarily faithful to the gospels. If I was critical of the film's detractors it's because I think it's unwise for any group to try to intimidate either the church or people of Mel Gibson's faith from speaking very clearly what they believe to be true. You know anti-Semitism is a terrible sin; it's a sin the church has repented from and will need to continue to repent from if and when there are examples of it in church life. But to clearly proclaim our belief that Jesus is the messiah and that he suffered, died and rose from the dead is for us something we have a duty to proclaim. We can't be intimidated from proclaiming it. It seems to me the rush to judge the film before it was even completed was an act of intimidation to prevent Christians from doing what they need to do. I can't speak for Mel Gibson, of course, but I think making the movie was for him an act of faith. I think it's a hugely significant personal venture for him. I think it's important for him to listen to the criticisms that come his way, but I also think he should be free to pursue his best judgments on the matter. Beal: The Anti-Defamation League and Rabbi Marvin Hier, the dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, have also objected to the film on the grounds that it is anti-Semitic and that, once released to the public, it could inflame anti-Semitic sentiment. Chaput: I don't agree. I think some members of the Jewish community have felt that any passion play, any depiction of the passion whatsoever, automatically begins in anti-Semitism. If such a case occurred the church would act to show how it is wrong and a sin. But with Gibson's film, certainly the version I saw, this isn't the case. (Rocky Mountain News, Aug 21, 2003) |
| 18 Catholic Leaders |
Knights of Columbus
Carl AndersonSupreme Knight Carl A. Anderson, head of the 1.6 million member Knights of Columbus, attended a July screening of The Passion. In introducing Gibson to leaders of the Knights, Anderson said “The Passion” was a powerful depiction of Christ’s crucifixion. “I urge critics who have not seen the final film to keep an open mind and not prejudge it,” Anderson said. If there is going to be a public debate about “The Passion” and religious rights, Anderson said, the Knights “would not duck from it.” Giving Gibson the opportunity to meet with the Knights, he said, “was making sure ‘The Passion’ gets a fair hearing. We hope such a hearing will promote better religious tolerance and dialogue among all religious faiths.” (Knights of Columbus, Aug 12, 2003) |
| 19 Catholic Leaders | Santa Clara University Jesuit Community Rev. Matthew Carnes I found “The Passion” to be a deeply moving and reverent presentation of Jesus’ suffering and death on the cross. I believe that this film will have a special appeal to young adults. I think “The Passion” will give them a rich sense of the person of Jesus and the meaning of his suffering, and will invite them deeper into faith and exploring the Bible. I will certainly promote the film among the students with whom I work, and can imagine hosting student discussions of it after viewing it. (From an email to Icon) |
| 20 Catholic Leaders | Thomas Aquinas College Thomas Dillon President I have spent my life teaching the Great Books and have a strong interest in film. I think what you have done in “The Passion” is extraordinary and will probably be recognized as the best religious film ever made. I will continue to pray for you and for the success of the film, and will ask our students to do so as well. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 21 Catholic Leaders | Evangelization 2000 Fr. Tom Forrest In time, I expect the film to be declared a masterpiece, and more importantly believe that it could have stunning and very positive repercussions throughout the world. For sure, it will make people talk and think, and that alone is a wonderful thing. Count on it that he and you have our prayers and the prayers of everyone we can invite to join with us in storming heaven for the spiritual and artistic success of this fine work of art. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 22 Catholic Leaders |
Crisis Magazine Deal Hudson
|
| 23 Catholic Leaders |
Cardinal Anthony BevilacquaI think that Mel Gibson has tremendous experience in the film world. I think used a lot of his, almost genius, in the film, having intuition almost on film making – how he was able to use that and take the scriptures, surely he and the others he used must have done a lot of research. I believe that he depicted it as something like Michelangelo would have done and say, “what’s the essence here, what am I trying to teach?” Art is generally getting beyond the physical, you have to teach something in any kind of artistic presentation, whether it be in music, or painting or a sculpture, you must be able to look at it and see beyond just what was the artist actually depicting, what was he trying to teach. And the highest art is when you can see God in any art. Whether it is depicting a landscape, you’ve got to see it’s God, a manifestation of God’s beauty. That’s the highest form of art, especially when it’s not a mystery, like modern art, because I don’t understand it. But great art to me is that I can see a manifestation of the attributes of God, the beauty of God, the mercy of God, the love of God, all of them. And I think that that came through in this film, of manifesting God’s infinite love for us and what He did for us. |
| 24 Catholic Leaders |
Father Richard John Neuhaus
|
| 25 Christian Leaders |
National Association of
Evangelicals Ted Haggard
President The National Association of
Evangelicals (NAE) affirms the importance of the authentic retelling of the New
Testament accounts in Mel Gibson’s latest film, The Passion. The NAE has
established this position of support for the film in response to numerous
attacks leveled at Gibson and the film. In interviews on CNN and various radio
networks, Ted Haggard, President of the NAE has described The Passion as,
"A beautiful, wonderful account of the last twelve hours of the life of Jesus
Christ. It is consistent with Matthew, Mark, Luke and John." |
| 26 Christian Leaders | Focus on the Family James Dobson Chairman It is deeply moving, powerful, and disturbing. A film that must be seen - although the graphic scenes of the scourging of Jesus are emotionally wrenching. (From an email to Icon) |
| 27 Christian Leaders | Focus on the Family Donald Hodel President and CEO What you showed to us was not simply another movie, to be compared with remembrances of previous cinematic portrayals of Christ, but rather something that breaks old boundaries and enters dramatic new territory. For what I believe to be the right reasons The Passion was profoundly compelling and affecting. The quality and realism of the acting, the setting, adherence to the historical record, its intensity and pacing all amount to an outstanding and moving film. It is unusually provocative concerning vital spiritual issues. For both Christian believers and for non-believers The Passion will penetrate the mind, heart and soul in ways that can only be memorable and positive. Any attempt to create a film rendering of a crucial portion of the life of Jesus Christ is a bold endeavor, and one bound to generate some amount of controversy. Let me further encourage you to withstand this premature and unjust criticism of your film and complete this important work of art. While some of its depictions of violence are adult-level material, this stunning film must be seen by as many people as possible. For our part, Focus on the Family applauds The Passion and it is a film we will heartily recommend to our constituents. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 28 Christian Leaders | The King’s Seminary Jack W. Hayford Chancellor “The Passion” is a forthright, compassionate, evenhanded presentation of the historic facts of the trial, crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. I found it deeply moving, factually accurate and unprejudiced in its presentation. As a Bible scholar, I was impacted by the integrity of the film to the testimony of scriptures. As a friend and supporter of world Jewry and modern Israel, I reject all suggestions of anti-Semitic bias for flavor in the film. As a Christian, I am grateful for the film’s potential to deepen devotion to the Savior and to more broadly offer the evidence of His love and sacrificial death to people everywhere. |
| 29 Christian Leaders | Focus On The Family Del Tackett Executive Vice President It has been nearly three weeks since I saw the rough cut of The Passion. It is still impacting my life. I can’t stop thinking about it nor can I stop talking about it. I have never seen a film that has so affected my life. It is powerful, moving, and disturbing. The film is true to the Bible and other historical evidence, yet it is alive with emotion and the harshness of reality. I do not want to see it again, yet I will be compelled from within to do so – not only again, but again and again. No one will be able to leave the theatre and not be moved at the core of their being. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 30 Christian Leaders |
Rick Warren
Pastor – Saddleback Church
Author – “Purpose Driven Life”
Brilliant, biblical – a masterpiece. (Comments following a screening) |
| 31 Christian Leaders |
Southern
Baptist Convention Jack Graham President The movie is biblical, powerful and potentially life-changing. The thing that I'm most excited about is the opportunity it's going to give those of us who preach the cross to explain the meaning of the cross and message of the cross to untold millions of people who are going to be asking questions about the cross and why Jesus died. There's no question it is the most hard-hitting display and demonstration of the crucifixion. (Baptist Press, Aug 22, 2003) |
| 32 Christian Leaders |
The Liberty Channel Dr. Jerry Falwell Mr. Gibson has attempted to painstakingly recreate the crucifixion of Christ, not to assail Jews, but to arouse in people a desire to understand the price paid for their salvation. I am praying that Mel Gibson's movie will have a powerful impact on our culture and that it will appeal to millions of movie lovers who are starving for a glimmer of honesty regarding the miraculous and life-changing story of the One who died for everyone, no matter their religious heritage, station in life, sexual preference or skin color. (From Falwell Cofidential, Sept 24, 2003) |
| 33 Christian Leaders | Crystal Cathedral / Hour of Power Dr. Robert Schuller I can’t tell you how I admire, respect and applaud you. May God give you the blessing you need, where you need it most. The Passion is an awe-inspiring portrayal of the last hours of Jesus’ life. It is an accurate account of Jesus’ real sufferings for the sins of the whole world. This is not a film anyone should miss. I make available to you the use our television program – the most widely viewed religious television program in the world – to promote your upcoming film! (From a letter to Icon) |
| 34 Christian Leaders | Christian Broadcasting Network Pat Robertson Chairman and CEO Without question, this is the finest work that has ever been done on this subject. The casting is superb. The action is gripping, and I believe that having the dialogue in Latin and Aramaic adds tremendously to the dramatic effect. Your treatment of the high priest and temple officials is sensitively done. It is clear that the small group of religious leaders were acting in an extra legal fashion without the full body of the Sanhedrin being present. The terrible suffering inflicted on Jesus Christ by the Romans was at the urging of a small band of power-hungry religious leaders, not by the Jewish nation. More than anything your portrayal of the suffering of Jesus is with a few exceptions in total accord with the biblical narrative. It is therefore wonderfully authentic. I understand there are at least 50 million evangelicals in the United States and nearly as many Roman Catholics. From what I can gather, the interest in your film is very high among those in these groups who have heard about it. In my opinion you will see a very large and enthusiastic audience when The Passion is released next March. It will be my pleasure to use whatever facilities we have available at The Christian Broadcasting Network to help you publicize this outstanding work. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 35 Christian Leaders | Trinity Broadcasting Network Paul Crouch, Jr. All I can say is Whoa! And get ready! It is one of the most powerful things I've ever seen. It basically starts at the Garden of Gethsemane and ends at the resurrection. It is without a doubt the best portrayal of Christ and the Crucifixion I've ever seen. In fact, it makes you want to take all Biblical epics and most "Christian" films and throw them right in the trash. (Including many of ours!!) This will do for "Jesus" movies what "Saving Private Ryan" did for war pictures. Every Christian MUST go see this movie and hold Mr. Gibson up in prayer. He's going to take a lot of heat for this project, but if we'll support him, this movie could have a profound spiritual effect on millions of people. (From a TBN email) |
| 36 Christian Leaders | Faith Television Network Jim West President It took a brave heart to make “The Passion”. “The Passion” is the most graphic, gritty and gripping depiction of Christ’s arrest, trial and execution ever made. As a film, it will become a classic work of art with dramatic lighting, authentic sets, compelling music, realistic dialog, believable actors coupled with a timeless story. (From an email to Icon) |
| 37 Christian Leaders | Young Life Denny Rydberg President As President of Young Life, I am pleased to voice my strong support for The Passion. The Young Life sphere of influence includes tens of thousands of staff and volunteers, as well as hundreds of thousands of adults and kids who would be lining up in an instant to see this film. In addition, I think the film will have mass appeal to people of any faith or no particular faith, simply because of the quality of the production and the historical nature of the content. My best to you as you move into the final stages of production and distribution. I'm thrilled about the prospect of a quality film of historical substance and modern appeal hitting the marketplace. Thanks for improving our options. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 38 Christian Leaders |
Youth For Christ/USA
|
| 39 Christian Leaders | International Bible Society Stan Kellner Mel and his team marvelously wove a tapestry of subtle and not so subtle Hebraic insights into the movie, e.g., the heal hitting the serpent’s head, Mary asking in Hebrew “Why is this night different from all other nights”, the flashbacks to the Jesus’ Passover Seder with his disciples (commonly called the Lord’s supper). The list goes on and on. As a Jew, while I see why some Jewish leaders might be offended, I must say that the only reason they would be is because of how close to the Scriptures you stayed in the telling of the story. There are a whole host of reasons why we, as Jewish people, can feel a keen sense of rejection, offense or other things by what some Christians have done “in the name of Christ” during the last 2,000 years. But, let me assure you that Mel Gibson is not to be named in that number. Mel has chosen the narrow road of staying true to the Scriptures. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 40 Christian Leaders | Harvest Crusades Pastor Greg Laurie I think the Passion is going to make history. Even after the film has had its impact in the theatres it will have a very, very long shelf life through DVD, etc. I can see that film being shown around the world to touch untold millions of people. Mel has created a resource that will make a difference in the lives of many for time and eternity. (From an email to Icon) |
| 41 Christian Leaders | Tim LaHaye Tim LaHaye Ministries THE PASSSION is the finest presentation of the last hours of Jesus’ life I have ever seen. It is a scripturally accurate account of how He really suffered for the sins of the whole world. The acting and production were superb, and the message leaves a lasting impact on both Christians and non-believers. Everyone should see this movie. The believers who see this film will be renewed in their commitment to Christ. Many non-believers will be moved to reevaluate His claim of dying for the sins of the whole world. No film in my lifetime has the potential of impacting more people with the world’s greatest story than THE PASSION. It is sensitive to the Savior, Biblically accurate, and both production and acting are of the highest quality. It could be Hollywood’s finest achievement to date. I was extremely impressed with Mel Gibson’s spiritual passion on wanting to present the true nature of Christ’s suffering for all the world to see. It gives a message that will benefit people of all faiths, cultures, and backgrounds. (From a letter to Icon) |
| 42 Christian Leaders | Chuck Colson Break Point Imagine for a moment that an Oscar-winning director, such as Steven Spielberg or Roman Polanski, announces that his nest project will be an historical drama. Now imagine that groups representing the people depicted in the film are demanding to see the script to see if it meets with their approval. There’s no way that any responsible director would give in to those demands. And, in refusing, he’d have the whole-hearted support of what is called “the creative community” and the First Amendment watchdogs. The exception, of course, is if the history in question is the passion of our LORD, in which case creative freedom is expected to take a back seat to the demands of political correctness. That’s what’s happening with Mel Gibson’s upcoming film The Passion. The Passion tells the story of the twelve hours surrounding the Crucifixion. While The Passion is only the latest in a series of films about Jesus, it stands out for two reasons: First, it is unsparing and unsentimental. In Gibson’s opinion, previous cinematic efforts had failed to capture the enormity of Jesus’ suffering on our behalf. This quest for fidelity has made some people nervous. Even without seeing the film, some Jewish and Catholic leaders have accused Gibson’s film of fomenting “religious a |